How Often Should Executives Have a Medical Assessment?

Book Consultation
Dr. Felix Lucian Happich

Dr. Felix Lucian Happich

MD, MHBA

In short

Overview


There is no evidence base for an optimal check up frequency, which is awkward for anyone selling an annual subscription.

Direct Answer


Without chronic conditions: about every three years under 50 and yearly from 50.

Cardiovascular risk separately: every three to five years from age 20, or yearly at borderline risk and above.

Anyone with a chronic condition such as diabetes warrants regular review regardless of age, with or without a general check.

Who This Applies To


Intervals by item

General review, under 50, no chronic conditions About every three years
General review, 50 and over Yearly
Cardiovascular risk Every three to five years from 20. Yearly at borderline risk or above
Blood pressure Yearly from 40. Every three to five years from 18 to 39 if normal and no risk factors
Alcohol screening Yearly
Breast screening Every one to two years from 40, by preference
Colorectal screening From 45, interval depending on method
Coronary calcium, if it was zero Three to seven years, and only if it would change a decision

Option Comparison / Decision Criteria


Yield falls after the first round.

The first screen picks up everything accumulated over years. Later rounds find only what is new, so fewer cases and a higher proportion of false positives among the positives

Repeating a test unnecessarily produces borderline results by chance.

Each one then needs chasing

Harm arrives immediately, benefit arrives years later.

For colorectal and breast screening you need to live 10 years for a 1 in 1000 chance of life extension

A new diagnosis: hypertension, diabetes, kidney disease

Starting a new medication, which needs earlier follow up

Moving into a higher cardiovascular risk band

A new diagnosis in a first degree relative, which can change your screening plan

A new symptom, which is dealt with when it happens rather than at the next slot

Why an In-Person Physician Review Matters


The trend is worth more than the snapshot A blood pressure of 134 means something different rising from 118 than falling from 152.

That is the real argument for regular review, and it works at three year intervals as well as at one. Continuity beats frequency Patients with an established relationship with one clinician have higher rates of appropriate preventive care. More visits to a regular clinician were associated with more colorectal and breast screening, lower incidence and mortality from both, and lower overall mortality. That is an argument for seeing the same doctor, not for seeing one more often. The honest caveat about check ups themselves General health checks did not reduce total, cardiovascular or cancer mortality in a meta analysis of 14 randomised trials covering over 180,000 people. They did improve blood pressure, cholesterol and BMI, especially in higher risk people. So the interval matters less than whether anything is acted on between appointments. When screening should stop Breast and colorectal screening continue while life expectancy is at least 10 years, usually meaning somewhere between 75 and 85. It is worth raising years in advance rather than announcing it, because stopping is easily read as being written off.

Practical Next Step

Cost & Timeline

Cost Timeline

A reasonable schedule for most people

  1. Age 20 to 39: cardiovascular risk assessed, blood pressure every three to five years if normal, general review as needed
  2. Age 40 to 49: blood pressure yearly, general review about every three years, breast screening discussed from 40, eye examination from 40
  3. Age 50 plus: yearly general review, colorectal screening from 45, prostate discussion from 50 for men
  4. Any chronic condition: regular review regardless of age

What to do between appointments

Nothing scheduled, by design. What matters is acting on what was found, and bringing forward anything new rather than saving it.

What happens here

The interval is set for you and stated, rather than sold as a subscription. If your age and health mean three years is more appropriate than one, you will be told that. An annual review can be booked as a single appointment even if you are seen elsewhere otherwise.

Recent Articles


Frequently Asked Questions


From 50, yes, and with any chronic condition regardless of age. Below 50 without chronic conditions, about every three years is reasonable. There is no evidence base for an optimal frequency.

No, that is expected. The first round finds everything accumulated over years. Later rounds find only what is new, so fewer cases and a higher share of false positives among the positives.

It also produces more borderline results by chance, each needing chasing. Harm from screening arrives immediately while benefit takes years, so shorter intervals shift that balance the wrong way.

Measurably, yes. An established relationship with one clinician is associated with more appropriate screening, lower incidence and mortality from colorectal and breast cancer, and lower overall mortality.

Evidence

Where this information comes from

Every figure on this page is taken from the sources below. All of them are free to read, so you can check them yourself.

Written and reviewed byDr Felix Lucian Happich

This page is general medical information and does not replace a personal consultation. Trial results are averages across large groups, not a prediction for any one person.

Scroll to Top